Unique Publications - Independent Publishing in Glastonbury, UK
  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • News/Blog
  • River Brue Rehabilitation Board
  • Glastonbury Archive Material
  • Other Glastonbury Authors
  • Bruce's Articles and Stories
  • Antonio Bivar
  • Local Resources
  • Unique Publications History
  • Contact
  • View Shopping Cart

What was the Southern Route shown on the Town Council's 'Road Consultation' map? (updated 7/6/18)

14/2/2018

5 Comments

 
Picture
There were two routes to choose from in the Town Council’s questionnaire last March, ‘A’ and ‘B’. We were given a choice between the two, with a third space to fill in our own suggestion. However practically nothing was said about ‘B’, the southern route, and nothing at all about any other possible alternatives.

The route that was shown on the Council’s sketch map south of the town dates from around 1970. This is the route that was originally proposed in conjunction with the Actis (Redlands) estate. The Town Council said that the plan was abandoned because of ‘changes in local government priorities’ – though they do not say what these changes were the result of, nor whether they are likely now to be changed after all.

Two possible reasons have been talked about, as to why local government priorities may have been changed at the time. One is that a very firm objection came from Millfield School, effectively blocking it. The other is that Mendip District Council refused to sanction the large house-building project that would have come with it, so close to the Tor. Possibly it was a combination of both of these reasons, together with Glastonbury’s Borough Council being downgraded to a parish.

At the eastern end, this route would join the present A361 near to the entrance of Millfield’s prep school (though probably much better from an engineering point of view if it could go through the middle of their playing fields). The proposed road is actually shown on the map re-joining the current route a little further away from Millfield and nearer the town, rather than following Cinnamon Lane. The map appears to have been simply copied from some old plans, and it is unlikely that either Millfield or Mendip were consulted about the possibility of the road proposal being revived.

At the other end, the map shows the bypass coming through Bretenoux road at the bottom of Redlands, then following the Butleigh road into the town before coming down Fisher’s Hill and then turning left onto the Street Road. At least one Councillor expressed his surprise that this route was being suggested, since it would not solve the traffic problem – it would simply move it along from Chilkwell Street and Bere Lane to Fisher’s Hill and Street Road. The whole debate would be likely to come up once again in the not-too-distant future.

A plan for an extended version of this route has in fact been discussed. This would follow the foot of Wearyall Hill before joining the A39 near Pomparles Bridge, between Glastonbury and Street. This, however, has not been officially made public.

It looked as though the inclusion of the southern route in the questionnaire was just to give a false democratic choice, since the chances of such a road being actually built seem so vanishingly small. What would happen if Glastonbury did agree to a route that was then turned down by the various higher authorities remains an interesting question. Since (as shown on the Town Council’s map) it would be much shorter, less expensive, less intrusive on the landscape and would require less from housing developers, then this was of course a possibility – though people did not see it as a realistic option.
​
According to planners (who were not consulted before the questionnaire was delivered to the public), neither route ‘A’ nor route ‘B’ are ever likely to be implemented.  More likely would be a shorter version of route ‘A’ (tighter to the Tor, from Edgarley to Tin Bridge roundabout), or the longer version of route ‘B’. Either would be worse, from the point of view of the environment and their affect on our landscape, than the routes actually suggested.

Facebook contacts: loveourlevels, normalforglastonbury

Other, more technical questions arising from the Road Consultation are discussed here:

What are the alternative routes to the A361 through Glastonbury?

​The Town Council has said that this consultation is only ‘preliminary’, and that we can consult further when we have ‘all the information’. Is this true?

What is the planning status of the old railway line? Surely the District Council’s Local Plan will spell out what it can be used for?

​Why is the Road Consultation being carried out in such a rush?

5 Comments
caroline ritherden
14/2/2018 11:53:31 pm

Where have the lorries gone when C
hilkwell Street, Bere Lane and now road through Walton are closed??? Seems to me this problem has already been solved!

Reply
Bruce Garrard
15/2/2018 12:58:31 am

If only it was that simple!
See the link above: 'What are the alternative routes to the A361 through Glastonbury?'

Reply
Steve Parkes
24/2/2018 11:12:46 am

Well - ever since I got your leaflet through my door, I've been in an agony of doubt and confusion about this. I still say that my first instinct is to applaud the idea of the Northern Bypass route along the old Transport Corridor that is the former railway route. That would keep all the heavy traffic well away from historic Glastonbury town itself, merely skirting its fringes and staying well away from the sensitive Chilkwell Street, Bere Lane and even keeping its distance from the Tor.
I think the 'B' southern route is a waste of time and a non-starter and would solve nothing to my mind.
I have valiantly been trying to understand all these 'alternative' freight routes that people have been suggesting, but they seem so obscure and fragmented to me that my brain just seizes up and I can't for the life of me understand how to process all that information sufficiently to be able to write it on the questionnaire (which I've now received) as a suggested alternative.
I regard myself as having a reasonable level of intelligence, yet I cannot get to grips with the alternatives that you are proposing. It is FAR too complicated - and I am quite sure that a very high percentage of Glastonbury residents will be feeling exactly the same as I do about it.
I haven't filled it in yet, but I'm STILL very tempted to go for the Northern Bypass as a practical and completely understandable route that would be extremely useful to me, personally, too!
I'm not too worried about its associated house/commercial development, either.

Reply
Bruce Garrard
25/2/2018 08:10:35 am

I would say well done for considering the situation carefully and honestly, whatever conclusion you come to; and perhaps well done too to those of us who have been attempting to stimulate an informed discussion on the subject. Sadly this would not have happened if it had been left to the Town Council.

Yes, the question of alternative routes is very complicated and confusing – so I don't believe that it was a fair question to include in the Town Council's questionnaire, particularly with no information offered at all about what the alternatives might be. You can always just tick 'neither' and leave it at that – it's unlikely that they will have time to analyse more than the tick-box answers.

Regarding the northern route, do bear in mind that although it would relieve Chilkwell Street and Bere Lane, the scale of development required to provide the necessary 'partnership funding' – increasing the size of Glastonbury by about 20-25% – would result in more people living along an even busier road than is currently the case.

Reply
ewan hayes link
9/3/2018 02:12:06 pm

one wonders what will happen at the next council elections ? the avalonian popular front?




Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    July 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    October 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    October 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.