Unique Publications - Independent Publishing in Glastonbury, UK
  • Home
  • About
  • News/Blog
  • Publications
  • Glastonbury Archive Material
  • Other Glastonbury Authors
  • Articles and Stories
  • Unique Publications History
  • Links
  • Contact
  • View Shopping Cart

A new Glastonbury relief road: what is really going on?

18/10/2017

3 Comments

 
Picture
Along the route of the old railway line below Glastonbury Tor ...

In Glastonbury, traffic coming along the A361 down Chilkwell Street and Bere Lane is a serious problem. In response to protests and petitions, three years ago an ‘A361 Committee’ was set up by the Town Council to consider possible solutions. This committee has, however, found itself ignored and side-lined by Somerset County Council, which appears to have its own agenda: to build a relief road along the route of the old railway line from West Pennard to the Wells roundabout (formerly Tin Bridge) – ultimately to become part of a proposed ‘Mendip Expressway’.

Before jumping to the conclusion that anything is better than the appalling heavy traffic that is right now ruining our homes and our lives, this relief road scheme needs to be looked at carefully.

It would be funded through ‘partnership’ with property developers, who would pay for the road in return for access to land for building houses and establishing light industry – initially in Brindham and Wick, though this would open up land along the whole route for future development.

The impact on the environment would be enormous. The heritage aspect of Glastonbury as a historical spiritual centre would be severely damaged. The Tor and Chalice Hill would be cut off from the open countryside and put in danger of becoming green blobs in the midst of urban sprawl. That which is most important here would be disrespected, even desecrated, and made subservient to a crass version of ‘economic development’.

Even this, however, would be an illusion. Most new enterprise that might be created in the development area would merely replace existing business that is at present situated nearer to the centre of the town. Meanwhile tourism, on which the town depends, would be flagrantly undermined.

Not many people realise that the Highways Agency was privatised in 2015 and replaced by a limited company, Highways England Ltd. Since then the government has been encouraging plans for a widespread and aggressive new road-building programme. This has been described as ‘saloon-bar policy making’, ignoring the evidence that building new roads simply leads to more traffic, that the suggested economic benefits are largely illusory, but that the damage to the environment is extensive and very real indeed. Construction work on the first wave of this programme is expected to begin in 2019.

In this context, Wells MP James Heappey has been promoting his plan for the so-called ‘Mendip Expressway’. Heappey is Parliamentary Private Secretary to Chris Grayling, the current Secretary of State for Transport. In its full extent, the ‘Expressway’ may go all the way from Nunney Catch near Frome, past Shepton Mallet and around Glastonbury, and then on to join the M5. However the signs are that it is to be presented as a series of local by-passes, each apparently meeting the needs of local communities desperate to escape the noise, pollution, damage and danger caused by an overwhelming volume of heavy traffic.

The reality of this proposal is actually for a major new road to carry this traffic through central Somerset to the motorway. There are right now several possible freight routes other than along the A361 and the A39, though this is the one preferred by the County Council – in consultation with the Freight Transport Association; it is the shortest route, not necessarily the best route. A new road would have very little to do with Glastonbury, Walton, or any of the towns and villages along the way, and would make little or no contribution to the economic well-being of these communities.
​
The problems on Chilkwell Street and Bere Lane may be alleviated in the short term, but this proposal would not be a long term solution. It would be a disaster for Glastonbury as a whole.

​Updated 6/11/17: Glastonbury and the Major Road Network
3 Comments
Hazel Eldridge
20/11/2017 08:34:11 am

Has there ever been the possiblity of a heavy tram. In the national rail network. with smaller third size containers Passenger space as required.Is there a simple way to lay concrete prefabricated track along existing dismantled railway lines..The present goods/freight firms would make massive profits using smaller consignments in vehicles for local
deliveries..

Reply
Charlotte Humpston
19/4/2018 03:19:37 am

Hi Bruce- I am VERY concerned about this road as PLAN A would cut right across the beautiful Levels below North Wootton. Plus the development that would follow would be devastating to the unique landscape. I could start a N.Wootton opposition group for this, keep me posted please.

Reply
Bruce Garrard
20/4/2018 04:53:37 am

Yes, North Wootton would be badly affected by a road along the old railway line. There will be a public meeting in Glastonbury in a couple of months, when the hope is to invite people from all the affected villages along the route from Frome to the M5 as well as Glastonbury people. In the mean time you can email me (bruce@glastonbury.co.uk) if you'd like to be kept up to date.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    October 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    October 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012

    RSS Feed

Powered by
✕